SKU: 52631567079

"Playboy: Girls/ Women Of The Ivy League Revealed" September 1979

Sale price$97.65 Regular price$108.50
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $27.12 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 15 - Jul 20

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

"Playboy: Girls/ Women Of The Ivy League Revealed" September 1979[286] pp. 1979 11" x 8 1 2" VG At the Dartmouth College library, Playboy magazine was in such demand this week that the librarians lent it out for only two hours at a time and checked carefully each time it was returned, to see whether any pages were missing. Students lined up at Harvard Square to buy the September issue of the magazine, and it sold out at Princeton. At Brown, fraternity members reserved copies ahead of time. At Yale, one newsstand

[286] pp.

1979

11" x 8 1/2"

VG

At the Dartmouth College library, Playboy magazine was in such demand this week that the librarians lent it out for only two hours at a time and checked carefully each time it was returned, to see whether any pages were missing.

Students lined up at Harvard Square to buy the September issue of the magazine, and it sold out at Princeton. At Brown, fraternity members reserved copies ahead of time. At Yale, one newsstand reported first‐day sales were seven times the average — and Yale is closed for summer recess.

Some professors joined the rush while others frowned on it, but no one maintained that he was reading the articles. Most turned quickly to page 159, the beginning of an 11‐page, full‐color feature on Ivy League women.

It contains 30 pictures of women from that high‐pressure academic world, where the emphasis is on preparation for, and promise of, a bright career.

With Phi Beta Kappa Key

The centerfold, a three‐page fold‐out distinct from the Ivy feature, features a University of California law student wearing only a sweater and cap. She has worked as a volunteer for the National Women's Political Caucus and wore her Phi Beta Kappa key to her first session with a Playboy photographer.

Being part of Playboy's monthly ration of flesh‐filled pictures did pose problems for some of the students who were photographed. One problem was the protests of campus feminists, who shad contended that the magazine degraded women, and whose anger was rekindled when the feature came out this week.

As they did last winter, when a Playboy photographer toured Ivy League campuses and advertised in student newspapers for women to pose for the feature, college feminists raised the issue of free speech versus perceived pornography. But they have not scheduled any feminist demonstrations since the magazine came out.

Various Explanations

“I don't think Playboy should exist at all,” said Naomi Cahn of Princeton's Women's Center. “I don't think It, should have been able to advertise to interview women for their pictorial, because their profits are built on a basis of exploitation of women.”

Most of the Ivy League women who posed maintained that the pictures would be forgotten by the time school opened next month. Their explanations for posing ranged from the idea that presented a challenge, to the concept that it was art. They were paid fees ranging from $100 fully clothed to $400 for unclothed poses.

Editors’ Picks

James Ellroy’s New Novel Is a Clash Between Cops and Communists

How a Family of 4 (and One Kid in College) Live on $85,000 a Year in the Bronx

Sqirl’s Dream of Los Angeles, Now at Dinnertime
“It was not a moral issue and it was just a challenge I couldn't resist,” said a Brown student, who posed using the pseudonym, Angela Ray.

“To me, posing for Playboy was no big deal,” said Carrie Margolin, a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at Dartmouth. “There must be a lot of people who feel that Ivy League women are sacred or something.”

“This was for Brown, and that's why I did it,” said Hillary Clayson, a 19year‐old sophomore, who called the feminists at Brown “extremely annoying.”

But, Miss Clayson continued, “I'm afraid of being asked about the maga‐. zine and what it does to women. I wonder if I haven't made a mistake.” She also said that she was glad the issue came out in August “because all the attention makes me nervous.”

The attention has created other problems for some of the women. Lisa Bennett Fedors, a Princeton graduate student, said she had received a few obscene telephone calls since the magazine went on sale. Others are worried that they might be recognized on the street.

Effect on Careers

And some are concerned that their career prospects might be endangered. But Vicki McCarty, the Berkeley graduate pictured in the centerfold, said that she had changed her mind—Playboy would probably be “a career advantage, instead of a disadvantage.”

Of the Ivy League women, one said she wants to be a biomedical engineer. Another owns a solar‐energy consulting concern with her husband. Another, whose $400 payment for being photographed went toward a trip to Leningrad, said she wanted to be a foreign correspondent for a newspaper.

Playboy made some converts among Ivy League women who had never expected to see themselves near a centerfold. Debbie K. Solomon, a Cornell art history major, turned down summer job offers from the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Hirshhorn Museum in Washington to work in Playboy's promotion department in Chicago. In the magazine she was pictured fully clothed.

“Too many people see an Ivy League education as career vocational training,” she said, “and your education should never be directed that way.”

Four others posed for Playboy but insisted on using pseudonyms, including Miss Ray, the only woman at Brown who lived in a fraternity. She said she insisted on the false name because she had not told her parents that she was posing and was afraid of what they would say.

Playboy spokesmen say the magazine ventured into the Ivy League expecting to find very bright women who were not very pretty. “You tend to think of Emily Dickinson types,” said David Salyers of Playboy. “Horsey women in tweeds.”

In the process, Playboy says, its own consciousness was raised. In previous features on college students the magazine referred to them as “girls.” After the anti‐Playboy demonstrations last winter, Playboy decided to refer to the Ivy Leaguers as “women.”

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 52631567079

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 22 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
JAMES HAYES
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 4
Instructions are useless
Size: 1 Panel
The instructions are poorly written and not very helpful. The divider itself is easy to assemble, and honestly, it would’ve been quicker if I had skipped the directions altogether. Once put together, though, it works as intended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 20, 2026
P
Platinum Motif
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
This was the best
Size: 1 Panel
This divider is great for creating a little privacy or separating a small area without taking up much space. The fabric is thick enough to block visual clutter, and the frame is lightweight but stable once it’s opened. It folds flat for storage, which is convenient if you only need it occasionally. Assembly was straightforward, and it was the perfect size. It’s a practical piece for apartments, studios, or home offices where you want a quick, temporary partition.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2026
J
John M.
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Good privacy screen
Size: 1 Panel, Size: 1 Panel
This is a good privacy screen that's easy to assemble and looks nice. Be a little careful moving it, as the corners can twist. It's sturdy once in place, and the thick material is completely opaque. If the folds bother you, you might want to iron it, but I'm happy with it as is.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2026
D
Dan & Stacey
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 3
Lightweight divider that works well for video call backgrounds
Size: 1 Panel
This divider works fine for what it is, but it’s definitely on the lightweight side. Setup was very easy and only took a few minutes. The frame is fairly light, so it’s easy to move around or reposition if needed. That said, the tradeoff is that it’s not especially sturdy. It stands fine on its own but I wouldn’t expect it to handle much bumping or movement. I mainly bought it to use as a background for Zoom calls when I’m working from my den, and for that purpose it works great. The fabric panel blocks the room behind me and gives a cleaner background on camera. It’s not huge though. To keep the camera from seeing around it, I have to position it directly behind my chair. If you’re expecting it to divide a large room or create a big privacy barrier, it may feel a bit small. Overall, it does the job and works well for temporary setups or video call backgrounds, but the lightweight frame keeps it from feeling like a premium divider. The product description and photos are accurate.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2026
C
Customer Review
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 2
Sent Wrong Pieces
Size: 1 Panel, Size: 1 Panel
I really, really wanted to like this - and, in theory, I really, really should have! The instructions were easy to follow and assembly took about five minutes. The assembled screen is lightweight and easy to move. It was a great size and exactly what I was looking for except....I wasn't sent the correct pieces. Instead of receiving 4 elbow pieces and 4 feet, I received 2 elbow pieces and 8 feet - meaning that the bottom part of the fabric just hangs there and, overall, the divider is extremely unstable because there is no horizontal support on the bottom. Thankfully, there are Velcro tabs on the side of the fabric so I can use it if I don't plan to move it even 1 cm, but otherwise, what I received is not usable for what I needed it for. Additionally, the fabric is made of polyester and catches animal hair very easily. Had I received the correct pieces, this would be a good buy for the money. Unfortunately, overall, I'm disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2026

recommand products